Brass bushings? The self-lubricating polymer revolution through FDM 3D printing

Additive manufacturing is challenging the brass-bushing status quo. Thanks to self-lubricating technical polymers such as PETG-PTFE, aramid-fiber-reinforced PA12, and carbon-filled composites, FDM 3D printing now offers a strategic route to lightweight, high-performance, custom bushings and plain bearings that require zero maintenance. The article examines—supported by hard data—the most innovative materials, guiding designers and engineers toward the optimal choice for replacing traditional metals, with a focus on prototyping, short-run production, and high-performance applications.

Brass bushings: the revolution of self-lubricating polymers with FDM 3D printing

In the world of mechanics, brass bushings and bronze bearings have represented a well-established solution for sliding applications for decades. Their wear resistance and low-friction properties are well known. However, technological innovation—particularly in the field of additive manufacturing—is introducing alternatives that not only match but, under certain conditions, surpass the performance of traditional metals. Today, thanks to advanced, self-lubricating technical polymers, FDM (Fused Deposition Modeling) 3D printing is emerging as a strategic alternative for producing bushings and plain bearings, especially for prototypes, small batches, and custom applications.

This article explores how specific composite filaments—all strictly Made in Italy and formulated with top-grade raw materials—can effectively replace brass bushings, delivering advantages in terms of lightness, zero maintenance, production speed, and customization. We will examine four innovative materials from the Stampatreddi brand, available in our 3DBooster store, comparing their technical characteristics to help you select the solution best suited to your design requirements.

Why consider an alternative to brass bushings?

The choice of brass is often driven by tradition and undeniable reliability. However, it has some inherent limitations that 3D printing with engineering polymers can overcome:

  1. Cost and production time: CNC machining of brass, while precise, can be expensive and time-consuming, especially for small batches or complex geometries.
  2. Weight: In sectors such as automation, robotics, or motorsport, weight reduction is a primary objective. Polymers offer a significantly lower density compared to metal alloys.
  3. Lubrication: Metallic bushings almost always require external lubrication, which entails maintenance, the risk of product contamination, and additional operating costs.
  4. Geometric complexity: Subtractive manufacturing imposes constraints on part geometry. 3D printing enables the creation of optimized shapes—such as internal cooling channels or lightweight structures—that are impossible to achieve with traditional methods.

FDM technology, combined with state-of-the-art composite materials, meets these challenges head-on, turning a seemingly simple component like a bushing into a powerhouse of innovation. The tribological properties of these tailored materials open up entirely new possibilities.

Polymer materials for replacement: analysis and comparison

The key to success lies in selecting the right material. Self-lubricating polymers incorporate low-friction particles (such as PTFE or aramid fibers) that migrate to the surface during use, creating a constant and long-lasting lubricating film. Let’s examine the available options.

1. PETG-PTFE: the versatile and cost-effective solution

For low-load, moderate-speed applications where cost and ease of printing are priorities, PETG-PTFE 3DBooster is an excellent choice. This material combines the easy printability of PETG with PTFE’s extremely low coefficient of friction.

  • Key properties:
    • Polymer base: Polyethylene Terephthalate Glycol (PETG).
    • Additive: PTFE.
    • Tensile modulus: 2200 MPa, indicating good stiffness for a non-fiber-reinforced polymer.
    • Tensile strength at break: 25 MPa.
    • Ease of printing: Does not require a heated chamber and prints at relatively low temperatures (230–240 °C), making it compatible with a wide range of 3D printers.
  • Ideal applications: Functional prototypes of bushings, low-duty machine components, sliding guides, parts for the packaging and light-automation sectors. It is the perfect entry point for anyone looking to start replacing brass bushings with a high-performance, reliable polymer material.
2. PA12 Kevlar (Aramid Fiber): resilience and thermal resistance

When the application demands greater resistance to wear, impact and temperature, Nylon PA12 Kevlar (KF) 3DBooster takes center stage. The Polyamide 12 (PA12) base is renowned for its toughness and low hygroscopicity (moisture absorption) compared to other polyamides. The addition of aramid fibers (Kevlar) enhances its tribological and mechanical properties.

  • Key properties:
    • Polymer base: Polyamide 12 (PA12).
    • Additive: Aramid fibers.
    • Charpy impact resistance (unnotched): 65 kJ/m², a remarkable value that demonstrates the material’s high toughness.
    • Heat deflection temperature (HDT) under load at 0.45 MPa: 115 °C, enabling use in hotter environments compared to PETG.
    • Elongation at break: 25 %, indicating good elasticity and the ability to withstand deformation without fracturing.
  • Ideal applications: Bearings for moderate loads, gears, industrial-machinery components, parts subjected to vibrations and impacts. Its resilience makes it perfect for replacing bushings in applications where brittleness is an issue.
3. PA12 Carbon-Kevlar (Carbon Fiber and Aramid): extreme stiffness and strength

For maximum mechanical performance, the Nylon PA12 Carbon-Kevlar (CKF) 3DBooster represents the state of the art. This compound combines the rigidity and dimensional stability of carbon fiber with the toughness and wear resistance of aramid fibers, all within a PA12 matrix.

  • Key properties:
    • Polymer base: Polyamide 12 (PA12).
    • Additive: Carbon fibers and aramid fibers.
    • Tensile modulus: 4500 MPa, more than double that of PA12 Kevlar and almost triple that of unfilled PA12. This translates into minimal deformation under load.
    • Tensile strength at break: 70 MPa, the highest value among the materials analysed, suitable for the most demanding applications.
    • Charpy impact strength (notched): 8.0 kJ/m², an excellent balance of stiffness and toughness.
  • Ideal applications: High-load bushings, precision bearings, metal-part replacement in motorsport and aerospace, structural brackets and components where minimal deflection is critical. It is the ultimate choice when uncompromising performance is required.
4. PC-PBT Kevlar (Aramid Fiber): superior chemical and thermal stability

In aggressive environments, where chemical resistance is as critical as mechanical strength, PC-PBT Kevlar (KF) 3DBooster offers a unique solution. The alloy of Polycarbonate (PC) and Polybutylene Terephthalate (PBT) creates a matrix that combines excellent thermal resistance and dimensional stability (from PC) with outstanding chemical resistance to oils, greases, and hydrocarbons (from PBT). The addition of aramid fibers ensures self-lubrication.

  • Key properties:
    • Polymer base: PC/PBT blend.
    • Additive: Aramid fibers.
    • Vicat Softening Point (50 N): 146 °C, the highest value in the group, indicating excellent high-temperature stability.
    • Tensile modulus: 2650 MPa, placing it between PETG-PTFE and PA12-CKF in terms of stiffness.
    • Print: This is the most technical material in the batch and demands extra care, with an extrusion temperature of 255–260 °C and thorough filament drying.
  • Ideal applications: Components for the chemical industry, pump parts, bushings for automotive applications (in contact with oils and fuels), supports in harsh industrial environments.

Comparative materials table

For an overall view, here is a table summarizing the main technical characteristics taken from the manufacturers’ datasheets. The values refer to specimens obtained by injection molding, as per ISO standards, and provide a solid basis for comparison.

Technical FeaturePETG-PTFEPA12 KevlarPA12 Carbon-KevlarPC-PBT Kevlar
Elastic Modulus (MPa)2200 1500 4500 2650
Ultimate Tensile Strength (MPa)25 35 70 55
Impact Resistance (Charpy n.i.)N/A65 kJ/m² 35 kJ/m² 35 kJ/m²
Extrusion Temp. (°C)230-240 250-255 250-255 255-260
Key StrengthsCost-effective, easy to printTough, resilientStiff, strongThermal and chemical stability

Conclusions: a step toward functional innovation

Moving away from traditional brass bushings in favor of 3D-printed polymer solutions is no longer a futuristic vision but a concrete and advantageous reality. The choice ranges from versatile materials such as PETG-PTFE to ultra-high-performance engineering polymers like PA12 Carbon-Kevlar, enabling designers and engineers to select the optimal solution based on load, temperature, chemical environment, and budget.

Adopting these materials not only optimizes the performance of individual components but also enables a new production paradigm: on-demand, customized, and incredibly agile. This is especially true for rapid prototyping and small-to-medium batch production, where the cost and lead time of traditional tooling are unsustainable.

At 3DBooster, we firmly believe in this evolution. That’s why we select and supply only high-performance filaments—such as those from the Stampatreddi brand—to support professionals and companies on their innovation journey.

Do you have a specific project or questions about which material is most suitable? Our team of experts is fully at your disposal to provide technical support and guide you toward the best solution.

If you found this article interesting, share it on your social channels to help other professionals discover the potential of FDM 3D printing. Subscribe to our newsletter to stay up to date on the latest developments in materials and technologies.